It is never easy to lose an unborn child. As a parent you prepare and look forward to the day you will hold your baby in your arms. When you lose a baby to unknown circumstances it’s difficult enough. But when you lose a baby unnecessarily there is no consolation.
I was reading an article recently that came out of the United Kingdom that clearly stated the recent deaths of unborn babies due to the Covid 19 gene therapy has spiked.
Recent government reports related to adverse reactions to the EXPERIMENTAL gene therapy show increased unborn deaths. The initial data was input in December 2020 through January 2021. The latest report covers from December 2020 to May 2021. That’s fourteen weeks separating, from first report to last report. This report shows a shocking increase in the number of women losing their babies prior to birth and just after birth. The gene therapy considered for these reports include Pfizer and AstraZeneca gene therapy (if you want to call them that).
The information below comes directly from the article published on May 16, 2021 in the Daily Expose. You can look at these screen shots below. You can also read the article here.
‘Pregnancy’
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women
of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.
We told you about this back in December, as the Governments own advice also included comments on breast-feeding and fertility which were as follows –
Breast-feeding
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to
the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used
during breast-feeding.
Fertility
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.’
It is because of this advice released by the UK Government that we were so shocked to see in the first released report of adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines, using data inputted to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme up to the 24th January 2021 a total of 4 women had suffered a miscarriage as a result of having the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
As well as a total of 2 women losing their unborn child as result of having the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.
We’re still unable to answer why these women were given one of the Covid vaccines against the Governments own advice. But what’s truly shocking is how much this number has increased in the fourteen weeks that have unfolded since.
According to the fifteenth report released by the UK Government on adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines, using data inputted to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme up to the 5th May 2021, there has been a 1,700% increase since the 24th January in the number of women who have lost their unborn/newborn child after having the Pfizer vaccine. The total number of miscarriages now stands at 66 alongside 1 report of premature baby death, 3 reports of fetal death and 2 reports of stillbirth. This is devastating.
The AstraZeneca jab has also caused unnecessary pain to expectant mothers. As of the 5th May there has been a 2,500% increase since the 24th January in the number of women who’ve lost their unborn/newborn baby, bringing the total to 52.
Tragically this includes 50 reports of miscarriage and 2 reports of still birth. Questionably only 1 of these cases has been labelled as a fatality.
The question is why are we seeing these numbers when the Governments own advice was that pregnant women should not have the vaccine?
Well the reason is that the Government has since updated it’s original advice. Click on the link to read the update.
There is a lot of information out there about this jab. Please take the time to do your research before letting anyone talk you into taking this EXPERIMENTAL jab.
Fair Use Notice: This article could contain some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add their photo.